Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johns v. League, Duvall & Powell Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 24, 1947No. 15937Published

1Dissent

Atkinson, Jnstice,

dissenting. While it is the duty of this court to construe pleadings and evidence in the most favorable light and most strongly to sustain a verdict, yet the fundamental rules of pleading and evidence must be fallowed.

Construing the petition in the instant case, the pertinent portions being set forth in the above statement of facts, it seems clear that the petition sought a recovery only upon an express contract; and I da not think that, by any reasonable construction, it attempts to set forth an implied contract upon which a recovery on a quantum meruit would be authorized.

N…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stetson v. StindtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
  2. Alford v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Pullman Co. v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Roberts v. RigdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Dolvin v. American Harrow Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API