Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Clinton Allsup

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 19, 1977No. 77-1581PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

566 F.2d 68

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,

v.

Richard Clinton ALLSUP, Appellant.

No. 77-1581.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 19, 1977.

Tom O'Toole, Tucson, Ariz., for appellant.

James E. Mueller, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.

Before KOELSCH and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and FOLEY,* District Judge.

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

1

Allsup appeals from his conviction for two bank robberies (18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)), contending that multiple errors in the course of his trial denied him a fair trial.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Frazier v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Stilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. United States v. NellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Charles Hedlund v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API