New Albany Historic Preservation Commission v. Bradford Realty, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants-Defendants, the New Albany Historic Preservation Commission and the City of New Albany (collectively, the NAHPC), appeal the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Appellee-Plaintiff, Bradford Realty, Inc. (Bradford), concluding that Bradford had not received due process when the NAHPC designated its property to be located in a historic district.
We reverse in part and affirm in part.
ISSUES
The NAHPC presents four issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as the following two issues:(1) Whether the trial court erred by declaring…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- John Kader v. State of Indiana, Department of Correction, and The Geo Group, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Roukaya Ali v. Alliance Home Health Care, LLC, L.J.L. Enterprises, Inc., and Larry J. LogsdonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Pierson ex rel. Pierson v. Service America Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- The Peoples State Bank v. Benton Township of Monroe County, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- 5200 Keystone Limited Realty, LLC v. Netherlands Insurance Comp., Consolidated Insurance Comp., and Indiana Insurance CompIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.