Tumey v. Daniels
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
This appeal involves a challenge to a candidate’s eligibility to run for state office. Appellant Robbyn Tumey is the Democratic Party’s candidate for the office of House Representative, District 95. Appellee Timothy Chad Hutchinson is the Republican Party’s candidate for the same office. In August 2004, Tumey filed suit in the Pulaski County Circuit Court seeking a judgment declaring Hutchinson ineligible to run for that office, because he allegedly did not meet the one-year residency requirement. Tumey also sought a writ of mandamus directing Appellees, Arkansas…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Robinson v. Craighead County Board of Election CommissionersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Jacobs v. YatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Jenkins v. BogardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Valley v. BogardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Storey v. LooneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Willis v. CrumblySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Clement v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Gray v. Thomas-BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Bailey v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Stephanie Potter Barrett v. John Thurston, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.