Legal Opinion
James River National Bank v. Haas
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 1944No. File No. 6927PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
On December 10, 1943, the plaintiff issued a summons as follows:
“ ‘State of North Dakota, In County Court County of Stutsman, ss.
The James River National Bank,' Plaintiff, vs. Adolph Haas, Defendant.
Summons.
“‘THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT:
“ ‘You are hereby summoned to answer the complaint in this action which is hereto attached and herewith served upon you, and to serve a copy of your answer upon the subscribers hereof within thirty days after the service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service, and in case of your failure to appear or answer,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Curtis v. SpeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Hammond-Chandler Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- McCoun v. . N.Y.C. and H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Heinrich v. EnglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Gans v. BeasleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schillerstrom v. SchillerstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- United Accounts, Inc. v. Teladvantage, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Coman v. WilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Union Storage & Transfer Co. v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Taylor v. Magnolia Pipe Line Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.