Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard Charles Bartholomew, Warren Gene Harris and Juleen Nicole Henry
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 15, 2002No. 00-2453, 00-1899 and 01-1614PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
Richard Charles Bartholomew, Warren Gene Harris, and Juleen Nicole Henry were indicted for conspiracy to distribute marijuana. Harris was also indicted for possession with intent to distribute the drug. After a jury convicted the defendants on all counts, the district court sentenced them to various terms of imprisonment. Bartholomew, Harris, and Henry now appeal, claiming that the district court committed numerous errors relating to their convictions and sentences. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the convictions and sentences of Harris and Henry,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Geoffrey M. Radvansky v. City of Olmsted FallsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Burt Lancaster v. Stanley Adams, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Noah Beverly Johnny P. Crockett Douglas A. TurnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Jose Ruiz Solorio (01-5602) Ricky Martin Luna (01-5603) Delmas Dennis (01-5666) Marco Juarez (01-5667)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.