Legal Opinion
Litz v. New Prime, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided November 20, 2024No. 6:23-cv-03278Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION CASEY LITZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 6:23-cv-03278-RK ) NEW PRIME, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Casey Litz’s motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. (Doc. 69.) Defendant New Prime, Inc. filed an opposition to the motion. (Doc. 76.) Plaintiff did not file a reply and the time for doing so has expired. After careful consideration and for the reasons explained below, the Court ORDERS that the motion for leave is GRANTED. Background For purposes of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Yolanda Bediako v. Stein Mart, Inc. A Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Lora Stuart v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Carlos Henderson and Charlie Richardson v. Officer Dennis Bolanda, Star No. 32Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.