United States v. William Ritter Rapp
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MUECKE, District Judge:
Upon his guilty plea to three counts of armed bank robbery, the appellee received a ten year concurrent sentence from the district court judge. Subsequently, appellee pled guilty to two different counts of armed robbery. A different district court judge sentenced appellee to a period of ten years to run concurrently with the appellee’s other sentence. The appellee filed a timely motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Rule 35, Federal Rule of Crimi nal Procedure. The rule authorizes a sentencing judge to reduce a criminal sentence within 120 days from the date the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Wayne Wilburn MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Garvis Eugene FreenyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. SheelaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1987
- United States v. Edward W. Ford, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. William R. RafeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991