Davis v. Frederick's, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice:
The controversy now remaining in this case is whether the action of an employee, defendant Dan Balderas, opening a door into an alley which struck and injured the plaintiff, was part of the operation of the business of his employer, defendant Frederick’s, Inc. (Fred’s Burger Chalet). As will appear below, the interests of the plaintiff Buelah Davis are not here involved. Her claim against defendants has been compromised and settled. Solution to the problem stated above is essential because the employer, defendant Frederick’s (and/or its insurer) contends that Security…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Martinelli v. Security Insurance Co. of New HavenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bartel v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. GasterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- O'Conner v. Safeco Ins. Co. of NaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. AlsopUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. Norma Jane Beeman and William A. BeemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.