Hadnot v. Ackerman

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CATHERINE HADNOT, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-01949-E § RANDALL ACKERMAN, LAW OFFICE § OF W. RANDALL ACKERMAN, LLC, § BARATA HOLLIS, and BARATA R. § HOLLIS, PLLC, § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are the Hollis Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 7) and the Ackerman Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 12). Having carefully considered the motions, the parties’ briefing, and applicable law, the Court concludes the motions should be GRANTED. BACKGROUND…