Legal Opinion

Carroll v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON RETURN TO REMAND

The cause presented by Carroll's appeal of the denial of his petition for writ of error coram nobis was remanded to the circuit court for an evidentiary hearing on the authority ofCarroll v. State, 468 So.2d 185 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984). This return to remand is consolidated with the appeal of the denial of Carroll's petition for writ of habeas corpus, which was filed subsequent to our remand order and was considered by the trial court during the ordered evidentiary hearing. This latter appeal is designated as 8 Div. 211. Both the habeas corpus petition and the error coram nobis…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Danny Ray Mylar, A/K/A Danny Ray Miles v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Rudy D. Cannon v. W.C. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. In Re the Personal Restraint FramptonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API