Legal Opinion
Young v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 27, 1976No. C-76-396-CBRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
RENFREW, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks review of an award by Public Law Board 1160 denying his claim for reinstatement and back pay. Public Law Board 1160 is a special board of adjustment, established by agreement between Southern Pacific Transportation Company (“Southern Pacific”) and plaintiff’s union, United Transportation Union (Switchmen), on August 16, 1973, pursuant to Section 3 Second of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. § 153). Defendant Southern Pacific has moved for summary judgment, and hearings on the motion were held on July 22 and September 16,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Central of Georgia Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- August Paul Rossi v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Transportation - Communication Division—Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Transportation-Com. Emp. U. v. St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1968
- Barrett v. Manufacturers Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sorensen v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1979
- Koloedey v. Mutual Beneficial Ass'n of Rail Transportation Employees, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Koloedey v. MUTUAL BENEFICIAL ASS'N, ETC.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981