Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriques

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 30, 1995No. CR 94-953PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Justice.

Appellant State of Arkansas brings this appeal pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 36.10, contending that the “correct and uniform administration of the criminal law requires review by the Supreme Court.” Appellee Beatrice Louise Rodriques pled guilty to one count of delivery of a controlled substance and two counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. She was sentenced as an habitual offender to ten years imprisonment. On appeal, the state submits that at the time the crimes were committed the mandatory minimum sentence was twenty years…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neely v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. State v. DennisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  2. State v. JoslinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. State v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Ashe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. State v. PinellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API