Legal Opinion

Young v. City of Ann Arbor

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1985No. Docket 85186PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Remand

Before: R. M. Maher, P.J., and Allen and M. J. Kelly, JJ. Per Curiam.

This is the third occasion for this case before this Court. Originally, we held that because the alleged negligent acts of defendant Police Chief Walter Krasny were ministerial in nature he was not entitled to assume the cloak of official immunity to shield himself from potential liability. Young v Ann Arbor, 119 Mich App 512, 519; 326 NW2d 547 (1982). Judge Maher dissented.

Subsequently, application for rehearing was granted. Upon rehearing, we concluded that under the "scope of employment” test for individual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Young v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Cody v. Marcel Electric Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Armstrong v. LeBlancMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Young v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kent County Prosecutor v. Kent County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Gallagher v. Detroit-Macomb Hospital Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Meadows v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Boggerty v. WilsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Hickey v. ZezulkaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API