Legal Opinion
Mannesmannrohren-Werke AG v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 5, 2000No. SLIP OP. 00-126; 98-04-00886PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WÁLLACH, Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
This case comes before the court following a remand to the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“the Department” or “Commerce”). Mannesmannrohren-Werke AG v. United States, 77 F.Supp.2d 1302 (CIT 1999) (“Mannesmann I”). Familiarity with the court’s earlier opinion is presumed.
The court finds that Commerce has remedied the defects in its earlier decision by identifying substantial record evidence in support of its use of adverse facts available in valuing Mannesmann’s billet purchases, and by applying non-adverse facts…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Allied-Signal Aerospace Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fujian MacHinery & Equipment Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Acciai Speciali Terni S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Allied Tube and Conduit Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Hyundai Electronics Industries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.