Legal Opinion

Ecken v. O'Brien

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 29, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

On August 21st, 1929, respondent, Ecken, suffered an injury by an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment with prosecutor. There were several “informal” awards, by the compensation burean, of compensation for the resultant disability — the last on the basis of twenty-five per cent, of total disability. On May 4th, 1932, after full satisfaction of this award, the first formal petition was filed. An answer was filed by the employer, and the proceedings terminated in a stipulation between the parties, providing for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hercules Powder Co. v. NieratkoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Hercules Powder Co. v. NieratkoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Lusczy v. Seaboard By-Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  4. McLaughlin v. Hahne & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  5. Federal Leather Co. v. DerensisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kozielec v. MacK Manufacturing Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Streng's Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. GalassoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  4. P. Bronstein & Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. Solazco v. Carol, New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API