Legal Opinion

Wade v. Allstate Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 6, 2013No. A13A0827PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

This appeal arises from the grant of summary judgment to Allstate Fire and Casualty Company (“Allstate”) regarding an attempt by its insured, Bernard Wade, to collect underinsured motorist (“UM”) benefits following a multi-vehicle accident. Allstate moved for summary judgment on the basis that Wade did not exhaust the limits of the insurance coverage for all defendants, which Allstate argued was required by the UM provision in his insurance policy. We conclude that questions of fact remain as to whether Wade would be entitled to UM benefits in this case because it is unclear…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Couch v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. Kent v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Daniels v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jenna Newstrom v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Royal v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  3. King-Morrow v. American Family Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. C & C Family Trust 04/04/05 ex rel. Cox-Ott v. Axa Equitable Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
  5. Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company v. Tammy RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API