Legal Opinion

Fregosa v. Mashable Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 9, 2025No. 3:25-cv-01094Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAWN FREGOSA, Case No. 25-cv-01094-CRB 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 MASHABLE, INC., Docket No. 34 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Dawn Fregosa brings this putative class action against Defendant 15 Mashable, Inc. (“Mashable”) under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”), Cal. 16 Penal Code §§ 630, et seq. Fregosa alleges that Mashable violated the Pen Register Act by 17 embedding third-party trackers on its website. According to the Second Amended 18 Complaint (“SAC”),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. US Ex Rel. Geraldine Godecke v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API