Wilson v. Fairchild
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Ramsey county, where the action was tried by Kelly, J.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
Action under the statute to determine adverse claims to real estate. The answer alleged substantially the facts hereinafter stated, claimed that the transaction set forth amounted to a mortgage subject to which defendant owned the land, and asked that he be permitted to redeem, that his title be confirmed, and for such other and further relief as might be just and agreeable to equity. The facts found by the court below were substantially as alleged in the answer, (except as to the allegations of a loan of money by plaintiff to Hanson,) and were, in brief, as follows: December 23, 1881, one…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Niggeler v. MaurinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Randall v. ConstansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Myrick v. CoursalleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Buse v. PageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Griffin v. JorgensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shraiberg v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Germania Bank of Minneapolis v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Kilgore v. ParrottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Citizens Bank v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Wellington v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.