Brayton Purcell LLP v. Recordon & Recordon

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS

CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Brayton Purcell LLP and Defendant Recordon & Recordon (“Recor- don”) are law firms. Each has a website. On November 24, 2004, Brayton Purcell filed suit against Recordon asserting claims for copyright infringement, unfair competition (federal and state law), false advertising (state law), and common law misappropriation based on Recordon’s alleged copying of Brayton Purcell’s website on elder abuse.

After the Court denied a motion to dismiss…