Legal Opinion
Steinle v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 30, 1995No. 90-1337-SACPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
Dorothy S. Steinle commenced this case seeking damages under the Equal Pay Act (EPA), Title VII, the Kansas Act Against Discrimination (KAAD), as well as supplemental claims for the intentional infliction of emotional distress. On February 4,1992, the court entered a memorandum and order which, inter alia, granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s intentional infliction of emotional distress claims. See Steinle v. Boeing Co., No. 90-1377-SAC, 1992 WL 53752, 1992 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 2708 (D.Kan. Feb. 4, 1992); see also Steinle…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Busby v. City of OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Clement SUMNER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Anne Dey v. Colt Construction & Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Jewel BURRUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF KANSAS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lyman v. Nabil's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995