Legal Opinion

Correll, Receiver's Account

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1925No. Appeal, 9PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Appellant’s account as receiver was advertised as required by the rules of the court below, was confirmed sec. reg. because no exceptions were filed, and an auditor was appointed to make distribution of tbe balance shown by it. This was before our promulgation of the amendments to the equity rules, requiring such accounts to be audited by the court in which they are filed. Owing to ill health, the auditor was unable to continue in the performance of his duties, and another was appointed to complete the work. This appointment was made after the adoption of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sproul v. Standard Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Behringer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Clauser's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  4. Chester Traction Co. v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Patrick's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Musser's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Hand's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Houghten v. Restland Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Andrew v. Sac County State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Harris v. SilvisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API