Legal Opinion

Roman v. Smith

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided May 31, 1930No. 1120PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAH, District Judge.

The plaintiff brings this action to recover damages from defendants Smith and Werlich, licensed surgeons and physicians doing business under the firm name of the Wallace Hospital, and the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, alleged to have been suffered by reason bf the unskillfulness and carelessness of one Horsky, acting for the physicians in setting and bringing the fractured ends of the femur bone in plaintiff’s left thigh so that a union might be effected. Smith and Werlieh owned and operated the hospital, and under contract with the Callahan Zinc & Lead…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ross v. Erickson Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Lincoln Park Coal & Brick Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Sarber v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hanson v. NortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Leahy v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958
  3. Claudine Beck Dehaven v. Dr. Philip CaulfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  4. Balancio v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API