Legal Opinion

Mallah v. Barkauskas

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 7, 1985No. 84-340PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE NASH

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs, Khosroyan and Tahreh Mallah, appeal from a judgment entered in a small claims action in favor of defendant, Bruno Barkauskas. Plaintiffs contend the trial court failed to apply the requirements of the statute relating to refunds of a tenant’s security deposit by a landlord and that its finding defendant had substantially complied with the statute was against the manifest weight of the evidence. Plaintiffs also claim attorney fees under the statute. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 80, par. 101.

The agreed statement of facts by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Applegate v. Inland Real Estate Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Hayward v. TinervinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Meyer v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Gittleman v. Create, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. Ikari v. Mason PropertiesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Evans v. International Village ApartmentsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Nadhir v. SalomonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API