Legal Opinion
Ekloff v. Rodgers
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 3, 2006No. CV05-407TUC-RCCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COLLINS, District Judge.
Oral argument was heard on February 24, 2006, regarding Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 11) and Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #28). Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby granted.
I. FACTUAL AND LEGAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs filed a class action law suit in June 2005. The named Plaintiffs are all minors under 21 years of age with numerous developmental and other disabilities who reside with their parents in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- N.B. v. HamosDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. BensonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- A.M.T. v. GarganoDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011