Legal Opinion

York Insurance v. Houston Wellness Center, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 20, 2003No. A03A1265PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

York Insurance Company (‘York”) appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment, arguing that under the plain language of the policy it issued to Houston Wellness Center, Inc. (“Houston”), it had no duty to indemnify and defend Houston in a bodily injury suit filed against it. Finding that coverage was clearly and unambiguously excluded under the terms of the policy, we reverse the trial court’s denial of York’s motion.

The standard of review of the trial court’s denial of [York’s] motion for summary judgment is a de novo review of the evidence to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bold Corporation, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Tucker Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BaloghCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. L. Carter Post 4472 Veterans of Foreign Wars, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Video Warehouse, Inc. v. Southern Trust Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Bonem v. Golf Club of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Meli v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Video Warehouse, Inc. v. Southern Trust Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API