Legal Opinion
United States v. Tuthill Spring Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 21, 1931No. Nos. 36393, 35708PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODWARD, District Judge.
These two eases involve the application of the same principles of law. Hence, a single opinion will dispose of both cases.
The Tuthill Spring Company from March 25,1919, to and including June 22, 1922, was engaged in the manufacture of leaf springs for replacement parts of automobiles. The Tuthill Spring Company designed and manufactured some 800-odd different sizes of types of springs called Titanic springs and designated each particular size of type of spring in its catalog by a particular stock number. Each spring so designated by a stock number was designed,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Burnet v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- McIlhenny v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
- Talcott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance Mutuelle v. California EmploymentCommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- The United States of America v. The Russell Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance MutuelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- González Padín Co. v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
- St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.