Legal Opinion

Bynum v. Fidelity Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1942PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

We have examined the exceptions to the admission of evidence. In some instances evidence of like import was admitted without objection. In other instances the evidence was not such as would likely affect materially the results of the trial. On the record as a whole these exceptions fail to point to prejudicial or harmful error. Neither can the exceptions to his Honor’s charge be sustained.

The only serious question for our consideration is as to the sufficiency of the evidence on the question of delivery.

The essentials of a gift causa mortis are set forth in Mordecai’s Law Lectures, Vol. 2, at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newman v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. . WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Buffaloe v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Sinclair v. TravisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Cartwright v. . CoppersmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Cartwright v. CoppersmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API