Legal Opinion

Patterson v. English

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1911PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Deaf Smith County Court; W. H. Russell, Judge. Action by Jeff Patterson and wife against Mrs. E. J. English and others to enjoin an execution, in which defendants brought a cross-action for damages on account of the temporary injunction. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

The principal question presented by this appeal is; What is included in the term “milch cow” as used in the exemption statute?

Appellant Jeff Patterson was the head of a family, and at the time of the levy of the execution herein owned and claimed as exempt property one cow and calf, one young cow, and three Jersey heifers. Execution in favor of the appellee was levied upon the heifers, and appellant, joined by his wife, filed this suit against the appellees for damages, and obtained a temporary writ of injunction restraining the sale.

[1] Sayles’ Civil Statutes 1897, art. 2395, reserves to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Alsup & Thompson v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Cobbs v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Berg v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. Nelson v. FightmasterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  5. Cone v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hickman v. HickmanTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. In Re VolpeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1989
  3. Walden v. McGinnesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. In Re PetersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1988
  5. In the Matter of Francisco A. Fernandez and Maura M. Fernandez, Debtors. Francisco A. Fernandez and Maura M. Fernandez v. Martin W. Seidler, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API