Legal Opinion
Arthur Nathaniel Aiken v. James Spalding, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, and Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General, State of Washington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 17, 1982No. 81-3592Published
1Opinion of the Court
684 F.2d 632
Arthur Nathaniel AIKEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James SPALDING, Superintendent, Washington State
Penitentiary, and Ken Eikenberry, Attorney
General, State of Washington,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 81-3592.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 6, 1982.
Decided Aug. 17, 1982.
Richard S. McMillin, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant.
James Lobsenz, Seattle, Wash., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.
Before GOODWIN and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and EAST,* District Judge.
GOODWIN, Circuit…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Robert Hawkins v. John E. Bennett, Warden, Iowa State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Orville Leland Davis v. Adult Parole AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Enrique C. Lerma v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.