Miller v. Pitman
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment quieting the plaintiffs’ title to an undivided one-fourth of a certain tract of land situate in the county of Los Angeles and awarding to the plaintiffs the sum of $1,750 for the use and occu pation of said lands for the period during which the trial court found the plaintiffs were entitled to the possession thereof.
The facts of the case, as revealed by the pleadings, proof, and findings, are generally these: In February, 1888, Elias W. Pitman died seised of a tract of land which included the land in suit. By his will, he left a life estate in the said land…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- William Hill Co. v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Keating v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Toland v. EarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Cunha v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Abels v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Callnon v. WinrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- National Exploration Co. v. RobinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Stevens v. TorreganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.