Legal Opinion

Greene v. Rolston

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 13, 1933No. 1 Div. 765PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

There -was a first and second mortgage on real property. The first mortgage was foreclosed and the property was purchased by a third person paying $198.38 more than the mortgage debt and expenses of foreclosure. The second mortgagee sued the first in assumpsit! for that amount. He brought the money into court and filed an interpleader under authority of section 10386, Code, naming the purchaser at the foreclosure sale as a claimant.

The claimant appeared and moved that the cause be transferred to the equity side of the court, 'on the ground that his claim was equitable and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. DupreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Derzis v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. First Nat. Bank v. MurphreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fiscus v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Freeman v. YoungCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  3. Womack v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Foshee v. Board of Education of Houston CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API