Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 21, 2017No. 16-1250PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Concurring opinion by Circuit Judge MILLETT.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

The question presented by the petition is whether the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, upon declining to review a decision of an Administrative Law Judge, see 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1), erred in rejecting Michael Wilson’s complaint of unlawful “interference” with his rights as a miners’ representative under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Amendments Act of 1977 (“the Mine Act”), 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(1). Wilson’s challenge arises in the context of a Section 105(c) “interference” allegation by a non-employee…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Meredith v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  4. Manin v. National Transportation Safety BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  5. Multi-Ad Services, Incorporated, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marshall Cnty. Coal Co. v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm'n & Sec'y of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. Alignment Healthcare Inc. v. HHSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API