Wilson v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Concurring opinion by Circuit Judge MILLETT.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
The question presented by the petition is whether the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, upon declining to review a decision of an Administrative Law Judge, see 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1), erred in rejecting Michael Wilson’s complaint of unlawful “interference” with his rights as a miners’ representative under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Amendments Act of 1977 (“the Mine Act”), 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(1). Wilson’s challenge arises in the context of a Section 105(c) “interference” allegation by a non-employee…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Meredith v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Manin v. National Transportation Safety BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Multi-Ad Services, Incorporated, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marshall Cnty. Coal Co. v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm'n & Sec'y of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Alignment Healthcare Inc. v. HHSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026