Legal Opinion

Marshall Cnty. Coal Co. v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm'n & Sec'y of Labor

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 7, 2019No. 18-1098PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Edwards, Senior Circuit Judge:

Section 105(c)(1) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Amendments Act of 1977 ("Mine Act" or "Act") prohibits mine operators from interfering with miners' exercise of statutory rights. See 30 U.S.C. § 815 (c)(1). This case involves claims by miners that mine operators interfered with their rights under Section 103(g) of the Act to raise anonymous complaints with the Mine Safety and Health Administration ("MSHA") regarding health and safety issues. See 30 U.S.C. § 813 (g)(1).

Petitioners are five underground coal mines in West Virginia and associated corporate…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. CTS Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  4. Jones Brothers, Inc. v. Sec'y of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  5. Meredith v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
  2. Rand v. SimondsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
  3. Secretary of Labor v. Westfall Aggregate & Materials, Inc. (AMENDED OPINION)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API