Legal Opinion

Sillick v. Ault

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided February 25, 2005No. C02-185-LRRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

READE, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION.741

II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND .741

A. Trial.741

B. Direct Appeal.742

C. State Post-Conviction Relief Proceedings.745

D. Federal Post-Conviction Relief Proceedings.749

III. STANDARD OF REVIEW.754

IV. 28 U.S.C. § 2254 MOTION.754

A. Applicable Standard .754

B. Analysis of Properly Exhausted Claims.754

1. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standard.756

2. Combined Defense Instruction and Marshaling Instruction Errors .757

a. Combined Defense Instruction.758

b. Marshaling Instruction Errors.760

3. Definitions of Specific Intent Elements .762

C.…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API