Legal Opinion

Nicholas v. Perricone, M.D. v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation, Defendant-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 20, 2005No. 05-1022, 05-1023Published

1Opinion of the Court

432 F.3d 1368

Nicholas V. PERRICONE, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Cross Appellant.

No. 05-1022.

No. 05-1023.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 20, 2005.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Raphael V. Lupo, McDermott Will & Emery, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Charles R. Work, Mark G. Davis and David A. Spenard. Of counsel were Mary C. Chapin and Evan Parke.

William J. McNichol, Jr., Reed Smith LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for defendant-cross appellant.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Catalina Marketing International, Inc. v. coolsavings.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. Richard Ruiz and Foundation Anchoring Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross v. A.B. Chance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API