McShan v. State

ON REHEARING

April 30, 1924.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

It is insisted that we erred in declining to consider appellant’s bill of exceptions No. 2, our action being based on the fact that said bill was in question and answer form. We have again examined it and have concluded that said bill should be considered, but in view of the qualification placed thereon by the trial court same presents no error. The evidence referred to in said bill, the rejection of which is complained of, would have had no effect save that of impeachment of the witness Balch. The court qualifies the bill by stating that Balch…