Waller v. Rogers
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANIELLE WALLER, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00808-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO v. DISMISS PAMELA ROGERS, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 31 Defendants. The motions to dismiss are granted. The complaint is dismissed, without leave to amend, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Even if there were subject matter jurisdiction, the claims complaint would be dismissed because of issue preclusion. This ruling assumes the reader is familiar with the facts, the applicable legal standard, and the arguments made by the parties. Claims…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Kevin Cooper v. Michael RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.