Legal Opinion

City of Olean v. Conkling

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaloney, J.

This action is brought by plaintiff, the city of Olean, to restrain the defendants from an alleged violation of a *64zoning ordinance, viz., erecting and operating an automobile filling station in a block in said city claimed to have been zoned as residential property.

The city of Olean, in 1920 or prior thereto, adopted an ordinance providing for fire limits and construction of buildings in the city, which was effective on December 15, 1934, viz.:

“ § 2. Plans to be submitted; permits. No walls, structure, building or part thereof, shall hereafter be built, enlarged or altered in said city until…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Matter of Monument Garage Corp. v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. People Ex Rel. Ortenberg v. BalesNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. City of Utica v. HannaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Welch v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Davie v. ColemanNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Alker v. CollinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API