Legal Opinion

Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. v. Peterson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 6, 1905No. 50PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

This case comes up upon writ of error to the Circuit Court for the district of New Jersey, to review a judgment entered therein against plaintiff in error, upon a verdict of a jury for $8,000 damages, besides costs. We will speak hereafter of the plaintiff in error as the defendant, and the defendant in error as the plaintiff.

The suit in the court below was an action in tort, founded upon the alleged negligence of defendant company, which resulted in injury to the plaintiff. The facts, as disclosed by the record, are that the plaintiff, at the time of the accident, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Commissioners of Marion County v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morris v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. Bollington v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Nordstrom v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Grammer v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  5. Props v. Washington Pulley & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API