Legal Opinion

United States v. Carl John Manthei

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 2, 1992No. 91-3417PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN SÍCKLE, Senior District Judge.

The government has appealed an order of the district court dismissing an indictment. The dismissal was ordered because the government delayed disclosure of an informer’s tape recorded conversations.' The trial judge had previously found the tape was discoverable under Fed.R.Crim.P. 16(a)(1)(A) (applicable in 1990).

We reverse.

I. BACKGROUND

On April 3, 1991 Carl Manthei was charged in a two count indictment which alleged that Manthei had knowingly and intentionally distributed a controlled substance to a fellow United States postal employee on two occasions.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Amadeo v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. North Dakota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Rural Water System 1 v. City of Sioux CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
  2. United States v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States of America,appellee v. Euka Wadlington,appellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Richard Alan TulkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Doe v. HartzDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API