Legal Opinion
PC Drivers Headquarters, LP v. Malwarebytes Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 6, 2019No. Case No. 5:18-cv-05409-EJDPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
In this action Plaintiff PC Drivers Headquarters, LP ("PC Drivers") alleges that Malwarebytes, Inc. ("Malwarebytes") wrongfully categorized PC Drivers' software as malware or a "Potentially Unwanted Program" ("PUP"). PC Drivers asserts claims under the Lanham (Trademark) Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1501, as well as claims for business disparagement, tortious interference with contractual relations, negligence and gross negligence, unfair competition, promissory estoppel, and declaratory relief. PC Drivers filed suit in the Western District of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Enigma Software Group USA v. Malwarebytes Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Enigma Software Group USA v. Malwarebytes Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019