Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Schiffman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 1, 1981No. 80-1682PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial judge correctly held that the second amended complaint failed to state a cause of action against the appellee landlord for injuries caused when a dog owned by his tenants bit the minor plaintiff while he was on the leased premises. Miller v. Sinclair Refining Co., 268 F.2d 114 (5th Cir. 1959); Simms v. Kennedy, 74 Fla. 411, 76 So. 739 (1917); Collins v. Otto, 149 Colo. 489, 369 P.2d 564 (1962); cases collected, Annot., Landlord’s Liability for Tenant’s Vicious Pet, 81 A.L.R.3d 638, 641-43 (1977). Compare, Uccello v. Laudenslayer, 44 Cal.App.3d 504, 118 Cal.Rptr. 741 (1975), where…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Simms v. KennedySupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Rollins A. Miller v. Sinclair Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Collins v. OttoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sparks v. KintzingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API