Legal Opinion

Havre De Grace Water Co. v. Mayor of Havre De Grace

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 10, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

This is a suit for the specific performance of an alleged contract of sale and purchase, under section 14 of Ordinance Ko. 172 of the City of Havre de Grace, and chapter 176 of the Acts of 1922, between the Mayor and City Council of Havre de Grace and the Havre de Grace Water Company of Harford County, of the said company’s plant.

Said section is as follows:

“Sec. 14. The Mayor and City Council of Havre de Grace shall have the right at the expiration of the period of twenty years from the date of the passage of this ordinance, and at the expiration of any one of the successive periods of twenty…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. ReaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  2. Walker v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Westminster Water Co. v. Mayor of WestminsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  4. Pompton v. Cooper UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. O'Brian v. County Commissioners of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leonardo v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. NoelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  3. Blum v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. NoelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API