Arizona Public Service Co. v. Town of Paradise Valley
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentSchroeder, Judge
The majority holds that municipalities, the governmental units closest and most responsive to the varying needs of specific localities in the state, are without authority to require undergrounding of utility lines. This result is, in my view, unfortunate, and unwarranted by our statutes.
There can be no doubt that early Supreme Court cases typified by Phoenix Railway Co. of Arizona v. Lount, 21 Ariz. 289, 187 P. 933 (1920), and State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light and Power Company, 15 Ariz. 294, 138 P. 781 (1914), held that the Corporation Commission was paramount in all matters affecting…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Borough of Roselle v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Corporation Commission v. Pacific Greyhound LinesArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Kahl v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Village of Carthage v. Central New York Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.