Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hamilton v. Cooley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1933No. 14,179Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Kime, J.

Being unable to agree with my colleagues I desire to express my ideas, with reference to this case, as follows: This was an action for damages caused by acts-which, in legal effect, amount to a conspiracy. The jury found that appellee had been damaged by the acts of the appellants as a result of the conspiracy.

In this case, as in cases appealed from the Industrial Board, if there is any evidence at all to support the decision of the trial court, the judgment of that court must be upheld or affirmed. The rule has been held to be that when fraudulent conspiracy is…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Martell v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Place v. . MinsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API