United States v. Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the question whether the Constitution requires the exclusion of physical evidence that was discovered on the basis of a defendant’s voluntary statement elicited without the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). While he sat in the back of a police car, Brian Devon Jackson admitted to his probation officer that the officer would find a firearm in Jackson’s bedroom. Police officers recovered the firearm, and a grand jury charged Jackson with firearm possession by a convicted felon. 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Kessler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- United States v. Chaidez-ReyesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
- United States v. Victor Manuel Manta-CarilloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.