Legal Opinion

United States v. Jackson

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 9, 2007No. 06-15186PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents the question whether the Constitution requires the exclusion of physical evidence that was discovered on the basis of a defendant’s voluntary statement elicited without the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). While he sat in the back of a police car, Brian Devon Jackson admitted to his probation officer that the officer would find a firearm in Jackson’s bedroom. Police officers recovered the firearm, and a grand jury charged Jackson with firearm possession by a convicted felon. 18 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Kessler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. United States v. Chaidez-ReyesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
  4. United States v. Victor Manuel Manta-CarilloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API