Legal Opinion
School Dist. No. 9 of Tulsa County v. Board of Com'rs
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 24, 1929No. 20109PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
A writ of certiorari was awarded petitioner, who seeks to avoid an order of the county superintendent of Tulsa county, approved on appeal, by the board of county commissioners of Tulsa county, abolishing and dissolving common school district No. 9 and attaching the territory comprising said district to independent school district No. 22 (city of Tulsa) and independent school district No. 27 (town of Jenks), both located within Tulsa county.
The petitioner contends: (1) Said orders were void for want of jurisdiction in that no proper petition was filed by the qualified electors of the territory…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Common School District No. 49 v. WolfeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Mills v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Consolidated School Dist. No. 72 v. Board of Ed.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- School Dist. No. 17, Rogers County v. Eaton, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Riley v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by8 opinions
- Board of Com'rs v. Woodford Consolidated School Dist. No. 36Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Littlefield v. HowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- School Dist. No. 65 v. Board of Com'rs of Payne CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- In Re WickstrumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Consolidated School District No. 41 v. DacusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.