Legal Opinion

Conger v. Danek Medical, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 18, 1998No. 4:96-CV-739-APublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER

MeBRYDE, District Judge.

Came on for consideration the motion of defendants American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (“AAOS”) and the Scoliosis Research Society (“SRS”) (collectively the “medical associations”) for summary judgment. The court, having considered the motion, the response of plaintiffs, David Conger, Ronald Gene Penny (“Penny”), and Teresa R. Penny, the reply, the record, the summary judgment evidence, and applicable authorities, finds that the motion should be granted.

I

Plaintiff’s Claims

The court recently described the nature of this action in a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conger v. Danek Medical, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API