Remington Rand Corp. v. Amsterdam-Rotterdam Bank, N.V.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEVAL, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Remington Rand Corporation (now The Kilbarr Corporation) (“Remington”) awarding damages exceeding $339 million against two Dutch banks (the “Banks”), Amsterdam-Rotterdam Bank, N.V. (“AMRO”) and Pierson, Heldring & Pierson, N.V. (“Pierson”). In prior litigation in the United States District Court for New Jersey, Remington obtained a judgment of $221,409,481 against Business Systems Inc., International N.V. (“BSI”), for misappropriation of trade secrets. See Remington Rand Corp. v. Business Sys., Inc., 830 F.2d 1260…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- United States v. Edmund M. AutuoriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Securities Exchange Commission v. Monarch Funding Corporation, Leo M. Eisenberg, Steven R. Cloyes, and Richard M. Cannistraro, Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Beaty v. McGrawCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Breeden v. Richmond Community CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
- Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., Bear, Stearns Securities Corp., and Richard Harriton v. 1109580 Ontario, Inc., Docket No. 04-3632-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.